Monday, May 4, 2009

Work & Lack Thereof

Sorry that I haven't been posting more lately. Work has been extraordinarily busy and the weather in London is getting nicer. Between the 2, writing stuff here just hasn't been a priority.

One of the things that's occupied me is watching a co-worker get a severance package. This person is doing meaningful work, at a high level of performance and their skills aren't easily replaceable. Nevertheless, their job is being moved overseas. From a business level, I understand the rationale. Labour costs overseas are considerably cheaper and senior management become convinced that a worker is a worker (ie - skills can be re-learned and/or are transferable). Time will tell about that latter point in my friend's case.

I know that my friend is not alone. Many Canadians in many sectors of the economy are being hit with this reality. I personally think that this time, it's a little different for the following reasons:
  • With most manufacturing and I/T moving offshore, where are the replacement jobs supposed to come from? In the 1930's Depression, when the economy improved, workers went back to manufacturing jobs that essentially existed before. That won't be the case this time.
  • Jobs are being moved offshore because of cheaper labour costs. Unless we also export unions, does this signal the decline and/or end of much of our middle class?
  • It appears that in some cases, the "bad economy" is being used as a rationale, but it's not the case for all companies. Many are still profitable, but (IMO) are using the downturn as an excuse to accelerate their outsourcing of jobs.
  • Workers are not given the option to reduce their wages to compare with off shore people. They're just told that the jobs are going.
  • Is it not a conflict of interest for senior management to be the decision makers that export basic workers' jobs but not their own? Surely, one could find some senior executive talent willing to work for less than what some North American corporate heads make?
  • With corporations basically being autonimous (ie - not a citizen of any country), is there anything that our governments could/should be doing to retain these jobs? Should companies be offered tax incentives to retain their work force?
Tell me what you think. Have you had friends, family members or have you lost your job in the past year? Did the work move off shore, to the US or did the company just close? Does anyone have a good news story about finding new work at any sort of wage or skill level on par with what they were doing in their former jobs?

Thanks for reading and sorry for the delay in posting.

6 comments:

  1. Steve: I try to put these thoughts out my mind. I have been laid off once already in my career and at my current employer I have survived two rounds of cuts since 2005. I find being cut has little to do with performance, so I feel powerless. Consequently, I just plow ahead. If it happens, it happens. Being laid off did not destroy me in 2001 and it won't destroy me now. I know I'll prosper in the end. I look at it as a temporary inconvenience. I try to take my cues from M'Lady, who doesn't define herself by her career. It's a blow to the ego, but it's not a permanent or even crippling one. I suspect you would find a way to survive too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dan, thanks for your comment. I've been doing my present job since graduation from university so I've never experienced what you have and it frankly terrifies me. Beyond your & my jobs, do you think that any employers are using the current economic situation as justification to "get away" with tougher work requirements, etc.? Do you believe that the "green jobs" we've been promissed will be our economic salvation in North America? Or, will we all wind up as Wal-Mart greeters?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Steve: Yes, I know of companies that are using the downturn to justify drastic action that, upon examination, is not necessary. That's not the fault of the recession. Evil people will take advantage whenever opportunities present themselves. I'll believe the green-collar hype when it happens. So far, it hasn't happened. The green talk all seems touchy-feely to me. Show me the jobs. As for Wal-Mart greeters, I think they get a bad name. I'm sure they are fine people. I can think of much worse jobs.

    ReplyDelete
  4. D, I didn't mean to defame Wal-Mart greeters; some of the nicest seniors I've ever met :-). As for the evil comment, I would say more greedy than evil and let's hope karma is a real bitch to those "deciders".
    Thanks for your post.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Steve: I meant evil. Apparently sociopaths do quite well in a corporate environment.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dan, that explains a lot actually.

    ReplyDelete